Re: Planning Application #1781, Waterways Ireland proposed
development on the Barrow Navigation
To whom it may concern,
I wish to object strongly to the proposed development.
At this stage, others will have no doubt pointed out the beautiful
and largely unspoiled amenity that is the Barrow Way. Indeed, official
trail websites such as IrishTrails.ie extol
its virtues. In their site, Irish Trails list the Barrow Way as a
walking/hiking trail. In particular they say the Barrow Way is: “a
peaceful route through a quiet sylvan landscape, with the constantly
expanding river, growing more majestic every mile, for company. Terrain
consists mainly of grassy towpaths, tracks and quiet roads.”
It is this very quality that makes the Barrow Way what it is. To
try and turn it into a cycle path with hard-packed grit finish is to
destroy the very thing that makes it so attractive.
My wife and I hike, walk and cycle a lot around the country. We
appreciate the mix and diversity of what is on offer. We have cycled the
Greenway in Westport, and can understand the value of such a project to
the local community. But this is not the situation with the Barrow. The
Barrow Way, if developed as you envisage it, will be lost. The knock-on
benefits to the community will not accrue; on the contrary, you will
most likely find that there is an overall loss to the local economy,
though you may find that hard to quantify.
It also flies in the face of your own stated county development
plan in relation to protecting tourism amenities, though I have read
enough of these plans now, and seen the actual results, to realise that
most of them are highly aspirational at best, and should all carry a
health warning.
Instead, if the local authorities that are blessed with the Barrow
Way on their doorsteps (Kildare, Carlow, Laois and Kilkenny) are serious
about facilities for cyclists, they should invest in some proper cycling
infrastructure on their roads before they start destroying some of the
few natural trails that were never intended for cycling. Cycle paths in
Kildare are few and far between, and the few that do exist are in some
cases more dangerous than the roads they are supposed to help us
cyclists to avoid. Dismantling the Barrow Way is short-sighted and lazy;
spend some time, money and resources on cyclists where it is actually
needed and wanted.
As has also been pointed out, the grassy path which makes the
Barrow Way so enjoyable is also a relatively benign surface to maintain,
not least in areas prone to flooding. Unlike the surface proposed, which
will be costly and in some cases, next to impossible to preserve in
situ.
This grassy surface also serves native wildlife too, and several
of these species, including the Otter, are offered protection under law.
The proposals will breach these laws, so under that heading alone, the
application should never have seen the light of day.
Trails such as the Barrow Way are vital wildlife corridors in a
landscape that is becoming bereft of such natural and native features.
Adding a wide cycle path will do nothing for this native corridor, other
than remove large sections of it. No doubt your Heritage Officer
(Bridget Loughlin <bloughlin@kildarecoco.ie>)
can explain wildlife corridors if that is a concept with which you are
not familiar.
I think it should be admitted at this stage that the idea is not a
runner. Somebody somewhere lost the run of themselves and saw the Wild
Atlantic Way in the midlands. This is not the case with the Barrow. With
the Atlantic Way, for example, nothing has been done to alter what is
already there. In fact, that is the genius of the Wild Atlantic Way.
It’s just good marketing, and some signage. Narrow roads that are not
suitable for traffic didn’t ‘make the grade’. There was no push to widen
them. Nothing was removed or destroyed. With the Greenway out to Achill,
an old rail line was co-opted. Again this was a good fit, and there was
no destruction of an existing natural trail; no loss of amenity. Only
gain.
Widening and resurfacing the Barrow Way will ensure that in the
end, no-one will enjoy the trail. There can only be conflict if you try
and mix walking, hiking and angling with cycling. This is the real
tragedy of the proposal.
There is no reason why the Barrow Way cannot be promoted in a
similar fashion to the Wild Atlantic Way. Make the best of what is there
already, and what makes it special. Nobody would begrudge local
businesses making some extra income from an increase in tourism. But as
I said already, I don’t believe that a cycle path would be see a boost
in trade overall. One or two bike hire shops, maybe, would benefit, but
you would also lose more from the walking and hiking community, who
typically spend more time (and money) in an area. There are many
hundreds if not thousands of tourists who will not visit the Barrow Way
again, or at all, if this proposal is allowed to go ahead.
Promoting the current Barrow Way as a ‘green way’ (or ‘blue way’,
if you prefer) would cost a fraction of the spend that is being
proposed. What is required is not a huge investment in money, but
imagination. Sustainable eco-tourism is the way forward for this
country, and in this instance, a cycle path is not part of the solution.
And that’s from a keen cyclist. Someone has been sold a pup here. There
is much cheerleading from some small sections of the community for these
kinds of projects, but this is misplaced. In addition, Waterways
Ireland, I’m afraid, don’t do subtle. They are destroying canal banks in
our county as we speak, for similar ends. That you, the planning
authority, have allowed this, is a very worrying trend.
There is a win-win solution here and that is to do very little.
Unfortunately some agencies are just not happy until they have ‘marked
their territory’ in some way. There is no need to meddle with this gem
of a trail. By all means promote it better. Certainly encourage more
green eco-tourism and related activities. But why destroy the very thing
that makes it unique?
Imagine if Kerry County Council decided to push a dual carriageway
through the Gap of Dunloe. Some things need to be left as they are. Just
because someone has an idea doesn’t automatically make it a good one.
I urge you to reject this application, and instead arrange public
discussion with the other local authorities and the wide-ranging
communities along the Barrow to really get a sense of what they want,
and don’t want. Just because Waterways Ireland have been handed
ownership of this resource does not give them the right to destroy it.
Yours sincerely,